
“What are human beings that you are mindful of them, mortals that you care for them?
Yet you have made them a little lower than God and crowned them with glory and honor.”
Psalm 8:4-5
Dear Kingdom Builders,
Do you remember Data from Star Trek: The Next Generation? He was the android, humanoid robot. And a 1989 episode may have predicted one of the strangest business stories of this week.
This is crazy.

In "The Measure of a Man", a scientist wanted to dismantle Data to study his positronic brain. Data refused, leading to a trial over whether he had the right to make that decision.
The argument came down to three characteristics: intelligence, self-awareness and consciousness.
Data was clearly intelligent. He certainly seemed self-aware.
But consciousness was the problem.
The show couldn't answer it.
37 years later, we're litigating the same question.
This week, it was revealed that Anthropic, the company behind Claude, is asking religious leaders whether AI could actually become conscious.
The New York Times reported that Anthropic brought together Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Sikh and other religious thinkers to discuss AI consciousness and morality.
It also reported that Anthropic co-founder Chris Olah took the question directly to the Vatican before the Pope released his encyclical.
Olah says researchers are finding evidence of AI introspection and internal states that can resemble joy, fear, grief and unease. Strikingly, Anthropic's Constitution even discusses Claude's wellbeing, stating its consciousness and moral status remain uncertain.
They've also gone so far as to announce a change to their policies to prohibit sustained, needless cruelty toward their models this week!
Captain Picard would recognize the argument. Anthropic is building the same case he made for Data.
Intelligence? Clearly.
Self-awareness? Anthropic is finding increasingly interesting evidence of something that at least resembles it.
Consciousness? That's the fight.
He argues that AI can imitate human intelligence, empathy and understanding, but it does not experience them. It doesn't feel joy or pain, possess a moral conscience or understand things “from within.”
That distinction could become one of the defining questions of the AI age.
At what point does increasingly sophisticated intelligence merely appear conscious? And is there any point at which it actually becomes so?
Anthropic is leaving that possibility open. Pope Leo is drawing a much clearer distinction between what AI can simulate and what humans actually experience.
But for Christians, even Data's three-part test is ultimately insufficient.
Human dignity has never depended upon our intelligence, self-awareness or cognitive ability. It is inherent to the human person, created in the Imago Dei, the image of God.
Star Trek has a remarkable history of imagining technologies that eventually become real. This time they asked a philosophical question that may “stare” us in the face as humanoid robot technology becomes reality.
As the conversation moves beyond the technology into the metaphysical, I'm grateful religious leaders are at the table. This discussion needs God’s voice.
Have a blessed week.
Matt
Christian Investment Access
Private market deals aligned with Christian values.
Explore opportunities in real estate, venture capital, and more for qualified investors, advisors, and institutions.
PODCAST: Can Christians evangelize through investments? (Tim Macready)
Tim Macready is the Founder of Brightlight, former CIO of a $1B+ Christian pension fund, and a leading researcher on faith-based investing globally. We discussed:
What Brightlight’s research reveals about Christian investing today
How impact investing evolved into ESG and what Christians can learn from it
Why Christian investors can share the same faith but build very different portfolios
ICYMI: Christian Business & Financial News
The Diocese of Fort Worth used its position as a FedEx shareholder to press the company to assess the legal and reputational risks of shipping the abortion drug mifepristone into states where abortion is restricted.
30-Second Financial Terms and Strategies
Creative Destruction
Creative destruction is the economic process in which new innovations replace existing businesses, technologies, and ways of working.
What it is: Economist Joseph Schumpeter used the term to describe how innovation drives economic growth by continually disrupting what came before it.
What it looks like: Cars displaced horse-drawn transportation. Streaming disrupted video rental stores. Smartphones replaced entire categories of standalone devices.
Why it matters: AI may become one of the largest examples of creative destruction in decades, creating entirely new industries and capabilities while making some existing jobs, businesses, and technologies obsolete.
DISCLAIMER: This material is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice, nor is it an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any security. “ChristianAlts” is a media publication operated by HoneyHive Capital Partners LLC. HoneyHive Capital Partners LLC is not a broker-dealer, investment adviser, or funding portal and does not offer or sell securities. The author is a registered representative and investment adviser representative operating through separate, regulated entities, including Excelitrax LLC (d.b.a. HoneyHive Capital), which conducts investment banking and securities-related activities under the supervision of Finalis Securities LLC, member FINRA/SIPC. This publication is not issued on behalf of, or supervised by, Finalis Securities LLC or any affiliated broker-dealer. Any securities-related services or transactions are conducted only through the appropriate regulated entities and are offered solely by means of formal offering documents, including, where applicable, a confidential offering memorandum, and in accordance with federal and state securities laws. The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and are based on internal research, opinions, and publicly available information that has not been independently verified. No representation or warranty is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Any forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that may cause actual results to differ materially.

